想要縮短《Science China Chemistry》雜志的審稿周期需要作者、編輯部和審稿人等多方面的共同努力，作者可以采取一些有效措施，間接地加快審稿進度，提升稿件的處理效率。

建議如下：

一、提高論文質量

（1）嚴格遵循投稿要求：在投稿前，仔細閱讀《Science China Chemistry》雜志的投稿指南，包括格式要求、字數限制、參考文獻格式等。確保稿件符合雜志的規范，避免因格式問題被退回修改，從而耽誤時間。

（2）提高論文質量：確保論文的研究內容具有創新性和學術價值，數據準確，論證嚴謹，語言表達清晰流暢。高質量的稿件更容易通過初審，進入同行評審階段。

二、選擇合適的投稿時機

（1）關注期刊審稿周期：在投稿前，了解《Science China Chemistry》雜志的審稿周期（預計1-3個月）和發表周期（月刊），以便合理安排投稿時間。

（2）關注期刊動態：了解期刊的專題征稿或熱點話題，針對性地投稿，可能獲得優先處理。

三、與編輯部保持良好溝通

（1）主動了解審稿進度：如果超過預計的審稿時間仍未收到回復，可以禮貌地向編輯部發送郵件，詢問稿件的審稿進度。

（2）尊重審稿意見：認真對待審稿意見，積極修改論文中的不足之處，共同探討論文的改進方向。

需要注意的是，縮短審稿周期的前提是保證稿件的質量，不能為了追求速度而犧牲學術嚴謹性。

《Science China Chemistry》雜志創刊于1950年，是由中國科學院主管、中國科學院主辦的學術理論月刊。國內刊號CN：11-5838/O6，國際刊號ISSN：1674-7224。該雜志以推動科技改革與發展、探索科技規律為宗旨，致力于為科技工作者、研究者和管理者提供一個學術交流的平臺。

《Science China Chemistry》雜志投稿建議：

Manuscript submission

Please provide in a cover letter the background, innovative and scientific value of the work presented in the manuscript, and authors’ publications related to this work. The detailed contact information of the first author and corresponding author is re-quired. (Please promptly inform the editorial office of any change of contacting emails and addresses.) The authors may

recommend 3–8 qualified reviewers and/or request the exclusion of specific reviewers. An informative cover letter is considered helpful for editors and reviewers to make evaluation of the sub-mitted manuscript.

Duplicate submission is forbidden and unethical. In such cases, the journal will inform the institution of the authors and the relevant journal(s).

Poor English expression of a submitted manuscript may lead to rejection.

Ethical responsibilities of authors

This journal is committed to upholding the integrity of science and the scientific record. As a member of the Committee on Publica-tion Ethics (COPE), the journal will follow the COPE guidelines on how to deal with potential acts of misconduct.

Authors should refrain from misrepresenting research results which could damage the trust in the journal and ultimately the entire scientific endeavor. Maintaining integrity of the research and its presentation can be achieved by following the rules of good scientific practice, which includes:

1.The manuscript has not been submitted to more than one journal for simultaneous consideration.

2.The manuscript has not been published previously (part-ly or in full), unless the new work concerns an expansion of previous work. (Please provide transparency on the re-use of material to avoid the hint of text-recycling (“self-plagiarism”).)

3.A single study is not split up into several parts to in-crease the quantity of submissions and submitted to var-ious journals or to one journal over time (e.g., “sala-mi-publishing”).

4.No data have been fabricated or manipulated (including images) to support the conclusions. Upon request au-thors should be prepared to submit relevant documenta-tion or data in order to verify the validity of the results. This could be in the form of, e.g., raw data, samples, and records.

5.No data, text, or theories by others are presented as if they were the authors’ own (“plagiarism”). Proper acknowledgements to other works must be given, in-cluding material that is closely copied (near verbatim), summarized and/or paraphrased. Quotation marks are used for verbatim copying of material, and permissions need to be secured for material that is copyrighted.

Important note: The journal may use software to screen for plagiarism.

6.Consent to submit, including each version of the paper and any change in authorship, has been received from all co-authors and responsible authorities at the institute/ organization where the work has been carried out before the work is submitted or re-submitted for publication. In addition, authorship changes or the order of authors are not accepted after acceptance of a manuscript. Requests to add or delete authors at the revision stage or after publication is a serious matter, and may be considered only after receipt of a written approval from all authors and detailed explanation about the role/deletion of the new/deleted author. The decision whether to accept the change rests with the Editor-in-Chief of the journal.

7.Authors whose names appear on the submission have contributed sufficiently to the scientific work and there-fore share collective responsibility and accountability for the results.

聲明：以上內容來源于互聯網公開資料，如有不準確之處，請聯系我們進行修改。